I was doing some cleaning in my garage and found my father’s old Kodak Retina IIIc. This is a camera he bought in the 1960s while he was stationed in Thailand. It was last used on a trip to Tennessee in the early 1980s. It’s been through hell. I cleaned it up as best I could, but the shutter button is frozen. After to talking online with people who are Kodak Retina enthusiasts, it looks like my best bet for a good repair Chris Sherlock in New Zealand. With shipping to and from New Zealand, I am looking at about $235 (USA) to get it fixed. I will probably do it after I get my tax return.
I will probably be using it for most, if not all, of my film photography in the future. The question is, do I send the film off to be developed, or develop it myself. If I develop it myself, I will need the equipment for developing and a decent film scanner. If I have someone else do it, I will have to send the film off. I tried a place local to me, and I was not satisfied with the results of the scans. Also, they don’t do black and white film. This will be my primary interest when using film.
On Facebook, it was suggested that I look at a used Triumph Scrambler based on the Triumph Bonneville. I will need to research this. I’m not certain about this style of motorcycle. I’m leaning toward a taller motorcycle that mimics the riding position of my mountain bike. Also, I’m wanting panniers. How will panniers handle that high dual exhaust. For that matter, how will I. Those are likely to get very hot. I’m going to watch some YouTube videos on these bikes.
If I go this route, I might look at a used Triumph Bonneville like this one below. There do not appear to be any used Scramblers in my area. And, I find the lower exhaust more comfortable.
While these bikes look good for daily commuting and day trips. But, for the photographic weekend trips I am considering, it doesn’t really seem to be suited to that. I will have cameras, lenses, tripod, clothes, and possibly camping gear. I’m not certain how all of that would fit on one of these bikes.
I’m considering getting a motorcycle. The reasons are:
Insurance is cheap – I can get full coverage for about $20/month
Gas – They are generally very fuel-efficient
I can buy a new motorcycle for less than the cost of an OK used car or truck.
I was thinking about a used truck. But, insurance would be more, it would be a lot less fuel-efficient for a daily drive to work, and probably be a lot less reliable than a motorcycle for the same money spent. When I need a truck, I can rent one for $20 from Home Depot or Uhaul.
It has been 20 years since I had a motorcycle. I will be taking the motorcycle safety course. I recommend this for everyone.
For the motorcycle, I am not interested in getting a cruiser style bike. I want something a little more nimble that can handle medium to long distances, and can moderate off-road conditions. After my 1995 Kawasaki Vulcan 500, I want an engine larger than 500CC. The Vulcan could barely get above 60 MPH. But, as I am looking at this as a new rider, I do not want the engine to be to large and powerful. So, I am thinking 650 to a 1000CC. I will probably get a used bike, but would like new (if I can swing it). If I can get a European motorcycle, I would prefer to get one of those. The research I have found shows that they hold their value better than the Japanese motorcycles.
The main purpose of this bike will be commuting from house in the suburbs to my work near downtown Dallas. I will also be using it make day and weekend trips for photography. Some of theses trips may take me down dirt roads and onto unpaved trails. So, some off-road capability will be a good thing.
Taking these factors into account, here are the motorcycles I am considering (in no particular order):
Kawasaki KLR-650: This is the venerable workhorse of the bikes I’m considering. As one friend put it, it is the AK-47 of motorcycles. The overall design is decades old. You have a huge line of aftermarket parts available. Used versions run about $3000. The thing is, the tech is also the most dated on these motorcycles. The engine is not fuel injected. C’mon, even Urals are fuel injected today (a Russian built motorcycle based on a 1930s German design). This is a motorcycle sold as a what is called a dual-sport motorcycle. This means that it is more of a dirt bike that is modified to run on the roads. Yet, it is generally recommended you replace the skid plate on it because it is not that durable. You are also advised to replace the oil drain plug with a low profile one. The stock version sticks out below the skid plate. If I buy one of these it will be used. That should mean most of the recommended upgrades have already been done. This is probably the most off-road capable of all of these motorcycles.
Kawasaki Versys 650: This is a pretty strong contender. It has strong reviews by both long-term owners and motorcycle magazines. It is just a 650 motorcycle with a good reputation for reliability. Leans way more to on road than off-road.
Honda NC700X: This is probably my last choice of all of these motorcycles. It has the least power. But, it has a couple of features I do like. The gas tank is under the seat. This means the center of gravity is lower. In the location of where a gas tank normally goes is a luggage compartment. This is big enough to hold a helmet. That is very convenient for when you are out running around. You can lock your helmet inside instead of carrying it with you. Leans way more to on road than off-road.
Honda Africa Twin: This is a very well reviewed dual sport/adventure touring motorcycle. I also doubt even a used one, if there is one on the market, will be in my budget. This is bike leans more to off-road than on road.
Suzuki V-Strom 650: Slightly more powerful than Versys and better on long trips. It is also the most expensive 650cc engine bike. Leans way more to on road than off-road. Strangely enough, the V-Strom is the most expensive of the 650 Adventure motorcycles.
Triumph Tiger: The picture is of an older model. The link is to the new models. This is one that will have to be used. (Link to info on model I will most likely buy.) New bikes are beyond my upper budgetary range. But, they are very nice bikes. It has a very good balance between on and off-road capability. The used bikes in my price range also top out in what I’m wanting as far as engine power.
BMW G650, F700, or F800 GS: The BMW G650 GS is my favorite of all of the bikes on the list. It has an under-the-seat gas tank. It also has a very good balance between on and off-road capability. It really is to bad that 2016 is the last year that BMW made the 650.
I will likely come back and add more information as I do more research. Since the KLR 650 was the first bike I considered when I started thinking about this, it is the one I have the most information on. I didn’t include any Yamaha motorcycles because I couldn’t find any Yamaha Adventure bikes in this size and price range.
Though, I will modify it for the next time I do it.
4 inch thick boneless pork chops
1 small onion
2 cloves of garlic minced
1 Cup of hard cider (I used Crispin The Saint (has maple syrup in it))
1 teaspoon instant chicken broth (I use Better than Bouillon)
1 cup of cream
1 8 ounce package of sliced crimini mushrooms
2 tablespoons of dried herb mixture (I used Harvest Eating Italian)
2 tablespoons of vegetable oil
1 tablespoon of butter
Salt and pepper
1. Preheat a large skillet to very hot. While it is preheating, diced up the onion and season the pork chops with salt and pepper. If you slice through fat and silver skin on the pork chops about every inch, they will not cup.
2. Add the oil to the skillet and let it heat until the oil shimmers. Brown both sides of the pork chops. Do not worry about them getting completely cooked. They will be cooked further later on. Set them on a plate until ready to add them back in.
3. Sautee the onions for a minute and then add the garlic. Once the onion is translucent, add the butter. Once it is melted, add the mushrooms.
4. Once the mushrooms are cooked, add the herb mixture. In the future I will add a tablespoon of flour too. I will then cook it until it is light brown. This will thicken the sauce.
5. Mix the instant broth with the cider and use ti to deglaze the pan. Then add the cream and the pork chops.
6. Heat to a simmer, cover, and cook for 10 minutes.
The peak occurred when a bad economic decline started and cell phone cameras started becoming good enough for most people's snapshots. Economic conditions have started to improve. And, the hobbiest photographer market has increased to the point that it is starting to take up the slack caused by the dieing point-and-shoot camera market.
Yesterday I took a panorama shot of a building near the Cedars station in downtown Dallas. When I got home I used Adobe Lightroom to stitch the photos together and did what I could to correct the image.
It’s not that good. The sky is blown out, it isn’t that sharp, and there is actually a piece of the picture missing in the upper right corner. This morning I took it into Photoshop to do corrections. I restitched the pictures together using Photoshop’s panorama tool. Corrected the exposure so that the building looked right and the sky wasn’t washed out. Then, I added in some sharpness. Overall, I’m very happy with the second attempt at this picture. Sometimes you just have to use the right tool for the job.
As I have previously posted, I’m looking at replacing my Canon camera with a Sony. As the article points out, they are late to the mirrorless camera market. Also, their offerings are lacking.
The Canon M3 – Requires an adapter to use the Canon lenses I already have. And, it costs a little more than the A6000. Less battery life. Slower photo shooting (Can 4 photos/second vs. Sony 11 photos/second). You have to purchase the viewfinder separately. But, the M3 does have a touchscreen. Though, I’m not really interested in a touchscreen.
The Canon M10 – Only about $50 cheaper than. No viewfinder. A worse sensor. I imagine I would need an adapter to use my Canon Lenses. The rest I don’t know sense it has not been released yet.
Overall, even though it has been out for over a year, the A6000 is a much better camera than the 2 mirrorless offering from Canon. Canon really needs to get their shit together. I used to be a Canon fanboy.
It is old, and very limiting in some areas (like low light photography). I’ve been looking at different options, and I think I’ve determined what I want to replace it with, a Sony A6000. The advantages the A6000 has over getting another Canon body for a similar price:
1. Better sensor.
2. Better low light performance
3. Wi-Fi connectivity. Both Canon and Nikon are falling down on this one.
4. In camera battery charging through USB.
5. Size. With a basic lens on the camera I can carry it in a cargo pocket.
6. On camera software functionality. The many functions that come built into the software that Canon does not have is beyond belief. It provides visual cues to what is in focus (useful for manual focusing) and what is under or over exposed.
7. The ability to expand functionality in the camera. You can actually download and low cost programs onto the camera that increase its functionality.
8. A free app for my phone that let’s me control the camera. I had to buy one for my Canon camera and either hook my phone directly to the camera or buy additional hardware (that I had to modify) to get my camera to connect to my phone.
9. Lens selection – Not only can I use Sony lenses with the A6000, I can also Canon lenses with an adapter. As a matter of fact, I would just get the adapter and use my Canon lenses on the Sony body.